Sustainability Questions
Reporting & Legislation
Solutions & Tips
FutureTracker News
All posts

Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS): Promises, Implications, and Challenges

Will Carbon Capture and Storage save the day, or is it just another pipe dream?
TL;DR Embed
TL;DR: Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) is a technology aimed at capturing and storing CO2 emissions from fossil fuels. While it offers potential benefits like mitigating climate change and creating economic opportunities, it also faces challenges like high costs, reduced energy efficiency, and concerns about long-term storage. As businesses explore CCS, it's crucial to integrate it into a broader sustainability strategy, with tools like FutureTracker offering a comprehensive view of their efforts.

In the quest to combat climate change, the idea of not just reducing but actively removing carbon dioxide (CO2) from the atmosphere is gaining traction. One of the methods proposed for this is Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS). But what exactly is it, and does it offer a realistic solution for climate change?

What is Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS)?

CCS is a technology designed to capture up to 90% of the CO2 emissions produced from the use of fossil fuels in electricity generation and industrial processes, preventing CO2 from entering the atmosphere. The captured CO2 is then transported and stored underground, usually in depleted oil and gas fields or deep saline aquifer formations.

CCS graphic

Implications of CCS

Mitigating Climate Change

If widely adopted, CCS can play a crucial role in mitigating global climate change, especially in industries where carbon emissions are inherently high and hard to reduce using other means.

Economic Opportunities

CCS offers potential economic benefits. There's a burgeoning industry developing around the technology, which means new jobs and investment opportunities.

Prolonging Fossil Fuel Usage

By providing a "cleaner" way to use fossil fuels, CCS could, in theory, allow for a more gradual transition to renewable energy sources.

Challenges Facing CCS

High Costs

Initial Investment: Setting up CCS infrastructure requires significant capital investment. The development of capture facilities, transportation networks, and storage sites can be costly.

Operational Expenses: Beyond the initial setup, there are ongoing costs associated with the capture process, maintenance of transportation networks, and monitoring storage sites to ensure no leaks or breaches.

Competing Technologies: As the cost of renewable energy sources like solar and wind continues to drop, CCS might face challenges in remaining a cost-effective solution in comparison.

Energy Penalty

Reduced Efficiency: Implementing CCS in power plants can decrease their operational efficiency. The energy required to capture, compress, transport, and store CO2 can result in a reduction of output by as much as 30% for the same fuel input.

Increased Fuel Consumption: Due to the reduced efficiency, plants might need to burn more fuel to produce the same amount of energy, leading to higher costs and partially offsetting the carbon reductions achieved by CCS.

Storage Concerns

Long-Term Integrity: While depleted oil and gas fields or saline aquifers are considered stable, there's no absolute guarantee. The concern is that stored CO2 could leak over time, potentially negating the benefits of capture.

Environmental Impact: In the case of a leak, there's a risk to nearby ecosystems. Elevated levels of CO2 could harm plant and marine life.

Limited Capacity: Suitable storage sites are finite. As more CO2 is captured and stored, finding appropriate and effective storage sites might become challenging.

Delay in Transition

False Security: With the promise of "clean" fossil fuels through CCS, there might be reduced impetus for industries and governments to invest in and transition to renewable energy sources.

Resource Allocation: Investing heavily in CCS could divert resources (both financial and intellectual) from the development and deployment of renewable energy solutions and other sustainable practices.

Public Perception: While CCS might technically reduce emissions from fossil fuels, the public might still perceive it as a continuation of the fossil fuel era, which could lead to trust and reputation issues for businesses adopting the technology.

While CCS presents a promising avenue to tackle the vast amounts of CO2 emissions, it is not without its challenges. As with all technological solutions to environmental problems, it's crucial to weigh the benefits against the potential pitfalls. For businesses, this means understanding where CCS can fit into a broader sustainability strategy and not seeing it as a silver bullet. Platforms like FutureTracker can be instrumental in helping organisations navigate these complex decisions, offering a holistic view of their sustainability efforts and impacts. As the climate crisis accelerates, comprehensive approaches and informed choices will be more vital than ever.

To accelerate your sustainable journey and learn more about FutureTracker, please book a no-strings-attached consultation here.

Increase your ESG-IQ!
Get the latest releases and tips, interesting articles, and sustainability news delivered straight to your inbox.
By subscribing, you agree to receive communications from FutureTracker by email
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
More climate insights
View all
More solutions and tips
View all
More reporting and legislation
View all
More news
View all
More FutureTracker news
View all
More client news
View all
More questions answered
View all
Recent articles
View all

Let's get started.